English

Posted on

A Perfect Storm

Letter from the UK

Huge swathes of the British working class are either on strike or will strike in the coming days and weeks. Scottish refuse collectors all over the country are striking. The Port of Felixstowe container terminal – handling half of the UK’s container traffic – has been essentially shut because of striking workers. There have been regular walkouts of engineering contractors, especially at refineries across the UK Postal workers, bus drivers, train drivers and other railway workers, London Underground workers, even nurses and other NHS workers, and telecoms workers are all striking or are about to. Even the criminal barristers are on indefinite strike. And there have been strikes at Amazon too. There has been nothing like this in the UK for decades. It doesn’t take much analysis to see why this is happening.

The UK is the seventh richest country in the world and yet tens of millions of people are facing penury. The demands for wage increases are near-universal. The simple fact is that the major capitalist – the state – is gouging out the wages of the working class at an almost unprecedented rate. Yet, the government economic policy – unlike that in the decade following the 2008 recession – is not officially austerity.  

Read More →

Posted on

A DEMOCRACY TO DIE FOR

“Russia’s war in Ukraine [is] a fight for global democracy, experts say”1

When the elite speak of freedom and democracy, duck and take cover!

We know this story all too well. Once our ancestors fought and died to liberate Jerusalem for the one true God, then for King and Country, for the Fatherland, for der Fuhrer, Il Duce, Uncle Joe (Stalin) and worst of all for ethnic nationalism. More generally they fought and died in conflicts claiming to be struggles between good and evil. God is always on the side of the soldier. In WWI they fought to “Make the world safe for democracy” and 30,000,000 deaths later some precarious form of democracy was attained; only to be swallowed by competing powers in the next decade, e.g. the Weimar Republic becomes the Third Reich and back to a democratic republic in a few short years. War needs the patriotic banners; the people need the songs and the sound of trumpets that urge them on to perform heroic deeds on the battlefield and to die for a glorious cause “if necessary.” In short, it would seem that the citizens need lies and democracy provides the most seductive deceit of them all.  

Read More →

Posted on

SOLIDARITY AND THE PANDEMIC

This is a response to the article Neither Idiots nor Sheep by comrade Sander. In it, Sander explores the impact that the virus has had on the economy and criticizes those, who, particularly in the left, essentially deny the reality of the virus by joining the no-vaxx camp, often mingling with reactionary forces on the opposite side of the political spectrum. Sander brings up the uncomfortable point that although capitalism will seize upon any crisis for its own ends, it is in the interest of both the ruling class and the working class to overcome the medical emergency. It is in the interest of the capitalists to have a “healthy” enough working class in order that they can continue squeezing profits in an uninterrupted process. It is also of course in the interest of the working class to have medical care against an objective life-threat. In this strained situation the polarization that has occurred fueled by conspiracies, misinformation and rightwing agendas seems to run contrary to a basic need for solidarity in overcoming an adversity which is social in nature.

I can find no fault at all with this criticism but I am left wondering in what shape this solidarity will manifest?  

Read More →

Posted on

AGAINST CAPITALIST WAR !

The following powerful text was written by the comrades of La Oveja Negra in Argentina.

No war is easy to understand, no “geopolitical” situation is simple to grasp. Even less so when it is assumed that there are no social classes in the world: there are only countries, leaders and political ideologies. Thus, there are those who support and justify the massacres and the horror of war. There are those who forget or want to make people forget that wars are fought for money. As comrades in Russia point out at this moment, behind the war there are only the interests of those who hold political, economic and military power: “For us, workers, pensioners, students, it brings only suffering, blood and death. The siege of peaceful cities, the bombings, the killing of people have no justification.” (leaflet of the Section of the International Workers’ Association of the Russian Region KRAS-AIT)

War makes explicit the horror of a society based on accumulation and profit. It is capitalist peace by other means. What is happening in Ukraine is added to the wars and invasions that unfortunately are nothing new (Palestine, Yemen, Syria) and to the millions of dead from hunger, misery, work, preventable diseases or suicide.  

Read More →

Posted on

DON’T FIGHT FOR “YOUR” COUNTRY !

Everybody hates war. Most of all the people who send other people to die on the battlefield. They claim that they abhor it, but alas, they’re forced to it by the other side. The other side, which is encroaching on our traditional hunting grounds. The other side, which is invading a “sovereign” nation. We have no choice! We must defend ourselves… Which “we” are you a part of? Relentless propaganda on both sides pushes everyone to pick a side, to become an active participant or cheerleader in the war. Because the other side is truly horrific. And it always is.

The Russian army is accused of war crimes. A strange term, “war crime.” A redundant one, really, because war is by definition a crime, the greatest of all crimes. Whatever the goal, the means are always mass murder and destruction. There is no war without atrocious massacres. The term suggests that there are two ways of waging war: a civilized one and a criminal one. If ever there was a difference between the two, it was erased by advances in military technology. Since the early 20th century, the percentage of civilian casualties in wars has grown steadily. In the 19th century American Civil War, military personnel still accounted for more than 90% of total war deaths.  

Read More →

Posted on

BARBARISM RESURFACES IN EUROPE (not that it ever went away)

The onslaught of the Russian military against the population of Ukraine is grotesque. Cruise and ballistic missiles and tanks are used indiscriminately against residential areas in cities and towns, and within days of its launch a million refugees and displaced people flooded the roads and railways; such numbers have not been seen in Europe since the end of the Second World War.

Internationalist Perspective will comment more as the situation unfolds. There are many aspects to this war but, for now, we want to stress a few key points.

The geo-political context for the current war is the rivalry between Russia and the Western powers in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union. Despite its assurances in the early 1990s, NATO moved east, absorbing several of the former Warsaw Pact countries and pushing right up against Russia’s borders. Over the decades since, Russia has been involved in several wars to prevent further fragmentation and to push back against Western encroachment: two Chechen wars, another in Georgia, and – following the replacement of pro-Russian by pro-Western leaders in Ukraine – the annexation of Crimea and the Donbas area (in 2014). Following the recent crushing of popular revolts and bourgeois faction fights in Belarus and Kazakhstan, Russian forces were in a position to increase the ongoing pressure on Ukraine.

  

Read More →
Posted on

NEITHER IDIOTS NOR SHEEP

2021, the second year of the covid 19 pandemic but unfortunately not the last, is over. In 2020, rather curiously, the hottest social conflicts were not directly related to the pandemic, but to police brutality, racism, the climate. In 2021, it was different. How to deal with covid became the focus of countless quarrels and riots, demonstrations, fights and endless discussions. The divide between the pro- and anti-vaxxers is deep. What is unusual is that it cuts across all groups. All classes, races, religions, countries, ages and other categories are internally divided on the question of what the situation requires.

The anti-vaxxers are a minority but not a small minority. They have an influence on policy and also on the course of the disease itself. Some of them find the name “anti-vaxxer” inappropriate because they are not against vaccines per se but against the obligation to be vaccinated. It should be a personal choice. What this means in today’s context is that they demand the right to refuse to follow the measures to limit infection, or to decide for themselves which ones to follow or not. But no one has a purely personal relationship with an infectious disease. A pandemic is by definition a social danger that can only be overcome socially.  

Read More →

Posted on

Interpretation or Change?

 “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.”   – Marx, Eleventh Thesis on Feuerbach

Of late, some members of IP have shown considerable interest in some works of academic Marxists.   I offer here some observations on academic versus revolutionary Marxism.

Not all academic Marxists are academics; Michael Heinrich, I understand, is not.   But he is certainly an academic Marxist, unmotivated by the need to change the world; this he declares bluntly since, for him, the revolutionary subject is a chimera.   For revolutionary Marxists this negativity is inconsistent with Marx’s view that to effect revolutionary change a revolutionary subject is needed and for the creation of a communist society that subject is the proletariat.   For Marx, the proletariat as revolutionary subject was an insight; for us, there is historical evidence of its actuality and potential as shown in the 1870 Paris Commune, in 1905 in Russia, in the 1917-1923 revolutionary wave that was expressed across the capitalist world.   For revolutionary Marxists, the revolutionary subject is not a conjecture.   Which does not make it easy to describe the link between the social movements of today and the appearance of the global social force of the proletariat tomorrow – particularly in view of the time elapsed since the last revolutionary wave.  

Read More →

Posted on

“Hide and Bide”

or

Did China really rise without trace?

At the 2017 Chinese Communist Party congress, Xi Jinping openly broke with Deng Xiaoping’s 1990 maxim for the Chinese Communist Party: “Hide your strength and bide your time.”    According to Xi, China was now in a “period of strategic opportunity.”   This may have been a reference to Trump’s recent election to the US presidency and the UK Brexit decision weakening the European Union.   The term had been used by previous Chinese leaders at times when the US was particularly distracted by other matters.   At any rate, Xi said that it was “time for [China] to take centre stage in the world.”

The nearly five years since have seen overt Chinese and American antagonisms magnify considerably.   The situation is important for several reasons:  materially, because it constitutes a major component of the power framework within which humanity lives, and theoretically, because the development of China over recent decades gives us an opportunity to assess how well our analyses have dealt with the reality of capitalist economic development historically.

The comrades who left the ICC in 1985 and formed IP at the time defended the ICC’s economic analysis of capitalism, the key element of which was that the current epoch of decadent capitalism was putting a brake on the development of the productive forces.    

Read More →