A Debate on Migration

Among the clearest signs of capitalism’s obsoleteness, at least from the standpoint of humanity, is the  growing dislocation of people caused by its crisis, by the poverty, the wars and the hopelessness it creates.  The story is horrific from beginning to end.  Horrific circumstances at home prompt ever more people to flee. Horrific travel circumstances cause many of them to die. And when they do reach their destination, many are locked up and many are deported, while many others remain stuck on the lowest  rungs of society. Most are considered “illegal”.  Increasingly, they are terrorized by the state. The influx of refugees is used, like the threat of “terrorism,” as a lubricant for the militarization of society, a license for more state control and surveillance. It is also politically very useful. Power can be gained by scapegoating immigrants (especially Muslim immigrants who can be linked to terrorism); by giving even the poorest compatriots the satisfaction of standing above someone else.

If you can’t offer real hope to the masses, you have to give them at least that.

At least for now this strategy works, as the electoral victories of Trump, Orban and other creeps show.  The success of the populist right has also pushed more traditional parties in Europe towards “tougher” policies on immigration.  

Read More →

La mayor promesa, la mayor mentira

 

El centenario de la Revolución de Octubre ha sido un asunto bastante apagado. No hubo desfiles en la Plaza Roja ni en Tiananmén, ni demostraciones, ni festividades. Incluso los izquierdistas le prestaron poca atención, con excepción de aquellos que sueñan con que Octubre se repita, esta vez con ellos mismos en el papel de los bolcheviques. En la mínima medida en que los medios de comunicación mencionaron el aniversario, fue para comentar que el comunismo había colapsado afortunadamente. Algunos le dieron un poco más de espacio. The New York Times Book Review, en su edición del 22 de octubre, dedicó siete artículos relacionados con el tema. Notablemente, en lo que se entiende como una crítica al totalitarismo, todos decían lo mismo: El comunismo es un experimento fallido, vivimos en el mejor de los mundos posibles. Sin discusión. Uno de los autores fue Francis Fukuyama, famoso por su afirmación de que el fin del régimen “comunista” en Rusia anunciaba “el fin de la historia”: inevitablemente todo el mundo se volvería capitalista y democrático. No hay otra alternativa.

Tan escasa atención es notable ya que, desde cualquier punto de vista, la Revolución de Octubre fue un terremoto que dejó profundas huellas en el curso de la historia.  

Read More →

The Greatest Promise, the Greatest Lie

The centennial of the October Revolution has been a rather subdued affair. There were no parades in Red Square or Tiananmen, no demonstrations or festivities.  Even leftists gave it sparse attention, with the exception of those who dream that October will repeat itself, this time with themselves in the role of the Bolsheviks. To the minimal extent that the mass media mentioned the anniversary, it was to comment that communism had mercifully collapsed. Some gave it a bit more space.  The New York Times Book Review, in its edition of October 22, devoted seven articles related to the subject. Remarkably, for what was meant as a critique of totalitarianism, they all said the same thing. Communism is a failed experiment, we live in the best of all possible worlds. No debate. One of the authors was Francis Fukuyama, famous for his claim that the end of the “communist” regime in Russia heralded “the end of history”: inevitably the whole world would become capitalist and democratic. The alternative is gone.

Such scant attention is remarkable since, from any point of view, the October Revolution was an earthquake which left deep imprints on the course of history.  IP has published several articles about it in the past [1] but we don’t want to let this centennial pass without a few remarks on its relevance today.  

Read More →

The New Nazism and its Opponents

 

 

Charlottesville was not the first time in recent memory the Nazis, the Klan and other “white nationalist” organizations have marched in the streets brazenly proclaiming their vile creed of white supremacy, anti-Semitism and race hatred. Yet, the events in Charlottesville seemed to mark a qualitative difference: A torch light rally accompanied by openly Nazi slogans of “Blood and Soil” and “Jews will not replace us” on August 11 was followed by a daylight rally of hatred which culminated in James Fields, a neo-Nazi who was photographed marching with the Vanguard America group, ramming a car into a crowd of counter-protesters murdering a protester, Heather Heyer.

The Klan was once a powerful force in American politics boasting over 4 million members with senators, governors and even a supreme court judge among its members. However a decades-long decline has reduced the Klan to squabbling factions; explicitly Nazi organizations have never been more than a momentary blip on the news feed. Yet, here were  emboldened rightists, seemingly in ascendance. What could account for this resurgence? Perhaps the belief that one of “their” supporters was in the White House. Former Klan Imperial Grand Wizard David Duke, who was present in Charlottesville, remarked that the neo-Nazis were in Charlottesville to “To take our country back.  

Read More →

Capitalism and “Natural” Disaster

The 1st of the month and rent is due!

Mortgage is due!!

Oh, you say you can’t pay??

What?? Can’t pay??

Haven’t been to work?

Flooding?

You say, Apartment is wet/stinky/moldy!

No electricity!!

Natural disaster, you say!

Sorry!!

Money is due!

Today is the FIRST!

 

CH

“Deberían Estar Muy Muy Nerviosos” *

* Trump, 10 de Agosto

No hay peligro de que en cualquier momento pueda estallar una guerra entre Estados Unidos y Corea del Norte (excepto accidentalmente; una posibilidad que no puede ser enteramente descartada). Pero, es significativo el hecho mismo de que los líderes de esos países abiertamente amenacen con usar armas nucleares, con embarcarse en una guerra total y causar la destrucción de un pueblo entero. No es sorprendente escuchar ese lenguaje furioso por parte del gobierno de Corea del Norte. Ha estado encubriendo su debilidad con fanfarroneos desde cuando podemos recordar. Pero es bastante alarmante que no suene sorprendente que el gobierno de Estados Unidos afirme la posibilidad de la destrucción total de un país. Por supuesto algunas cejas se levantaron pero no hubo un masivo grito global ante la locura total de ese escenario.

Ninguna guerra nuclear es inminente pero la guerra de palabras con Corea del Norte sirve para vacunarnos contra la idea de que eso es inconcebible. Nos están acostumbrando a la idea de que ”el interés nacional” podría requerirlo, de que quienes se resisten a ello son débiles ó traidores. Es un signo más de la creciente trayectoria destructiva del mundo capitalista.

Como en una reyerta en un patio de escuela, el conflicto disminuirá.  

Read More →

“Soyez Trés Trés Nerveux” *

(* Trump, 10 août)

 Il n’y a aucun danger que dans l’immédiat une guerre puisse commencer entre les États-Unis et la Corée du Nord (sauf accident, une possibilité qui ne peut pas être entièrement exclue). Mais le fait même que les dirigeants de ces pays menacent ouvertement d’utiliser des armes nucléaires, d’engager une guerre totale et de causer la destruction d’un peuple entier est significatif. Un tel langage de furie de la part du régime nord-coréen n’est pas surprenant. Depuis très longtemps celui-ci n’a cessé de dissimuler sa faiblesse derrière ses fanfaronnades. Mais il est plutôt alarmant qu’on ne soit pas trop surpris par le fait que le gouvernement des États-Unis affirme la possibilité de la destruction totale d’un pays. Quelques sourcils ont été froncés, bien sûr, mais il n’y a pas eu de protestation mondiale massive à propos de la pure folie qu’incarne ce scénario.

Aucune guerre nucléaire n’est imminente, mais la guerre de mots avec la Corée du Nord sert à nous vacciner contre l’idée que cela inconcevable,  à  nous habituer à l’idée que «l’intérêt national» peut l’exiger, que ceux qui s’y opposent sont des mauviettes ou des traîtres. C’est un signe de plus de la trajectoire de plus en plus destructrice du capitalisme mondial.  

Read More →

Be Very Nervous

There isn’t a danger that any time soon a war could start between the US and North-Korea (except accidently, a possibility which can’t be entirely excluded).  But the very fact that leaders of these countries openly threaten to use nuclear weapons, to engage in total warfare and cause the destruction of an entire people is significant.  To hear such furious language from the North-Korean regime is not surprising.  It has been covering up its weakness with bluster as far as we can remember. But it’s rather alarming that its sounds not surprising that the government of the US affirms the possibility of the total destruction of a country.  Some eyebrows were raised of course, but there was no massive global outcry over the sheer madness of this scenario.

No nuclear war is imminent but the war of words with North-Korea serves to inoculate us against the idea that it is inconceivable. We’re getting used to the idea that “the national interest” may require it, that those who resist it are “bleeding hearts” or traitors.   It’s one more sign of the increasingly destructive trajectory of world capitalism.

Like a school-yard brawl, the conflict will de-escalate. But it will not go away. The position of North-Korean ruling class is defensive, expansion of its territory or markets is not its aim, but it wants to stay in power.  

Read More →

Oxen, Donkeys, and Dragons

There was an interesting discussion on the discussion-list Meltdown recently, between Mac Intosh of IP and a Meltdown regular, GS. It started on democracy and continued on revolutionary defeatism and ended with Mac Intosh sighing that it boggled his imagination that GS could claim that in such a war, one must choose one imperialist camp against the other, and still profess to be a revolutionary internationalist. To which GS replied that his imagination was boggled too, as it seemed to him beyond discussion that any sane person would have ardently hoped that Nazi-Germany would be defeated. “I give up”, he wrote, and so it ended.

Asides from the fact that no credible scenario can be conceived in which Germany could have won the war, the consequences of such an unlikely outcome are unknowable: we are in alt-history here, in which the global extermination of entire races is as possible as a global uprising, or anything in between.  Intriguing perhaps, but not very relevant to our reality, it seems to me.

The essential point to make is that any hope to escape from the atrocities of war and genocide springs from the autonomization of the collective worker from capitalism. Identifying with “our own” capital in war against another does the opposite: it ties us to the interests of our oppressors.  

Read More →

Bueyes, Burros y Dragones

Recientemente tuvo lugar una discusión interesante en la lista de discusiones Meltdown, entre Mac Intosh de Perspectiva Internacionalista (PI) y GS, un participante de Meltdown. Comenzó sobre la democracia, continuó con el derrotismo revolucionario y terminó con Mac Intosh suspirando al decir que le resulta incomprensible que GS pudiera afirmar que, en tal guerra, uno debería elegir un campo imperialista contra el otro y seguir considerándose revolucionario internacionalista. A lo cual GS replicó que él tampoco se puede imaginar, porque considera fuera de toda discusión, el que cualquier persona cuerda no esperara ardientemente que la Alemania Nazi fuera derrotada. ”Me rindo” escribió, y así terminó.

Fuera del hecho de que ningún escenario creíble puede ser concebido, en el cual Alemania hubiera podido ganar la guerra, las consecuencias de tal resultado improbable son desconocidas: aquí estamos en la historia alternativa, en la cual, la exterminación global de razas enteras es tan probable como un levantamiento global, o cualquier otra cosa entre esas alternativas. Intrigante a lo mejor, pero no me parece muy relevante para nuestra realidad.

La cuestión esencial a señalar es que cualquier esperanza de escapar a las atrocidades de la guerra genocida surge de la autonomización del trabajador colectivo con respecto al capitalismo.  

Read More →